Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Hostage Rescue Team in Training

These are pictures of a major elite Hostage Rescue Team in Asia in training for Close Quarter Battle and Maritime Counter Terrorism.

We have also reviewed the film Zero Dark Thirty and we do think the film's producers should have hired us to ensure the actor's combat movments were professional.
For one thing, the Team Leader does not yell out for the Breacher (EOD guy) to move forward to plant explosive charges onto the door and exdecute. Hand Signals by the Team Leader will do. Quiet.  Silence please.

Also, combat movements for assaulters was messy and haphazard.











Friday, 15 February 2013

The War ain't over yet.





Have hired guns finally scuppered Somali pirates?

Meteorite hits Russia

Stunning images as a meteorite explodes over Russia.  Slideshow 
Pirates are boating before German navy from frigate Rheinland-Pfalz intercepted them in the Gulf of Aden off Somalia's coast on March 3, 2009, in this picture made available on March 4, 2009. REUTERS/Bundeswehr
ABOARD RMS QUEEN MARY | Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:29pm EST
(Reuters) - Posted between septuagenarian passengers in deck chairs, lookouts stand watch over the Gulf of Aden, scanning the horizon for pirates.
After more than half a decade of Somali men attacking Indian Ocean shipping from small speedboats with AK-47s, grappling hooks and ladders, the number of attacks is falling fast.
The last merchant ship to be successfully hijacked, naval officers monitoring piracy say, was at least nine months ago. It's a far cry from the height of the piracy epidemic two years ago, when several ships might be taken in a single week to be traded for airdropped multi-million dollar ransoms.
But as the Queen Mary 2, one of the world's most recognisable ocean liners, passes through the Red Sea, Indian Ocean and out towards Dubai, its owners and crew are taking few chances.
"The pirates have weapons and are not afraid to use them," Commander Ollie Hutchinson, the British Royal Navy liaison officer aboard the liner for its trip through the Indian Ocean, tells a briefing of passengers in the ship's theatre. "Once the pirates have identified their target, they will try whatever means they can to get on board."
To underline his point, he displays a picture of an Italian helicopter hit by small arms fire from a pirate dhow late last year followed by assorted images of gunmen holding AK-47 assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades.
In truth, the Queen Mary 2 - carrying 2,500 passengers and 1,300 crew from Southampton to Dubai on the first leg of a world cruise - is not particularly at risk.
Some 345 metres long and 14 stories high, even its promenade deck is seven floors above the sea. The liner is fast, hard to board and - on this passage at least - moderately well armed.
Like many merchant vessels, the QM2 now carries armed private contractors when passing through areas of pirate risk.
Cunard will not discuss precise security arrangements. But contractors on other vessels routinely carry M-16-type assault rifles and sometimes belt-fed machine guns, often picked up from ships acting as floating offshore armouries near Djibouti and Sri Lanka.
Additional lookouts from the ship's regular onboard security force - mostly Filipinos - are also posted on the main deck to give warning of any suspicious craft.
"Depending on what happens with attacks, I'm hopeful we may be able to reduce our security measures when we pass through the same waters next year," says Commodore Christopher Rynd, senior captain of the British-based Cunard line and current master of the QM2. "But that's not a decision we will be making at this stage."
A CHANGING GAME?
When ships do come under attack, the first phone to ring is usually in a nondescript white bungalow in the gardens of the British Embassy in Dubai.
The UK Maritime Trade Organisation (UKMTO) was set up shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks to provide security advice to British shipping in the area. As pirate attacks soared in the second half of the last decade, it found itself coordinating international shipping across much of the Indian Ocean.
Most vessels passing through the area - container ships, tankers, cruise liners and dhows - now register daily with UKMTO. If they believe they are in danger, they will contact the British team to request military support.
"We've had calls when you could hear gunfire and rocket propelled grenades in the background," says Lieutenant Commander Simon Goodes, the current officer in charge. "But lately, the phones are ringing much less."
The only confirmed attack this year, Goodes said, was on a merchant vessel in early January as it sailed towards the Kenyan port of Mombasa. On-board private security guards repelled the assault after a 30 minute firefight.
According to the European Union anti-piracy task force EU NAVFOR, 2012 saw only 36 confirmed attacks and a further 73 "suspicious events" - incidents in which a crew report a suspicious craft that might be pirate but could also be simply an innocent fishing boat. That itself was a substantial fall from 2011, with 176 attacks and 166 "suspicious events".
Only five ships were captured in 2012, down from 25 in 2011 and 27 in 2010.
"This is an important year," says Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline Sheriff, spokeswoman for EU NAVFOR. "We will find out whether this fall in piracy is really sustainable."
Sea-borne attacks off West Africa, however, appear to be on the rise in what some analysts believe is a sign that Nigerian and other criminal gangs may be tempted by the Somali pirate model.
PIRATE BUSINESS MODEL FAILING?
Exactly what is behind the fall in Somali piracy is a matter of debate.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the navies patrolling the Indian Ocean say the numbers show they are finally having an impact. Since piracy first grabbed global attention in 2008, a number of nations have sent ships to the region.
Sailing through the Internationally Registered Transit Corridor, a protected route between Somalia and Yemen, the QM2 passed warships from the United States, France, India and Australia.
As well as the EU force, there are separate flotillas from NATO and U.S.-led coalition forces that often include Asian vessels. Several other nations including China and Russia also keep ships there, running convoys through the "high-risk zone".
In May last year, EU NAVFOR launched its first onshore raid, targeting a suspected pirate group on the beach as it prepared to head to sea with helicopter and small arms fire.
Not everyone, however, believes that explains the fall. For many in the shipping industry, the fall in attacks is a vindication of the decision to massively ramp up the use of armed guards.
So far, not a single ship with armed guards has been taken by pirates - although naval officers and other piracy specialists say hired guards can be excessively trigger-happy and have fired on innocent fishermen from India, Oman and Yemen.
The situation is also changing in Somalia, which has been without a functioning government for two decades. The present administration is becoming more effective, as is an African military force tasked with tackling Islamist rebels.
RETIRED PIRATE, DARKENED LINER
Last month, one of Somalia's highest profile pirates told Reuters he was giving up his life of crime at sea.
"I have given up piracy and succeeded in encouraging more youths to give up piracy," said Mohamed Abdi Hassan. "It was not due to fear of warships. It was just a decision."
In an apparently separate development, three Syrian hostages held since 2010 were released without the payment of a ransom. Four vessels are currently still held by pirates along with 108 hostages, the EU says.
The bottom line, some military officers and analysts believe, may be that the lower success rate for pirates in the last year has prompted those bankrolling them to stop.
But no one is taking the pirates for granted. An apparent attempted night-time attack on a merchant ship only a handful of miles from the entrance to the Gulf at the Strait of Hormuz was a reminder attacks can take place across a huge area.
Shortly before entering the Suez Canal, QM2 held a security drill to instruct passengers in what to do if the ship comes under attack.
Passengers were urged to return below and sit in the companionway outside their rooms until the danger passed.
As dusk falls, orders are given to darken ship. Passengers close the curtains over their portholes or balcony windows, while crew members install blackout curtains in public areas. Basic running lights remain on to avoid collision, however.
The purpose, Commodore Rynd says, is to make it harder for any pirates to identify what kind of ship the QM2 might be and how far away. The darkened ship also makes it easier for the lookouts, equipped with night vision goggles, to see.
Other more vulnerable ships - particularly the "low and slow" - take more precautions. Shortly after first light, QM2 passes a bulk carrier, its fire hoses blasting over its stern to make it harder for pirates to clamber aboard.
In more remote parts of the Indian Ocean, the nearest naval support can be eight or nine hours away.
Aboard the liner, however, passengers seem largely unconcerned.
"It doesn't worry me at all," says Kiki O'Connell, 66, from Portland, Maine, as the ship approached Dubai. "Although I don't suppose we'll see any pirates now. I was hoping for Johnny Depp."
(This story was fixed to correct paragraph 15 to UK Maritime Trade Organisation, not UK Marine Transport Operation)
(Editing by Giles Elgood)

Monday, 15 October 2012

Blah. Sri Lanka. As Usual.


Shipping Firms Facing New Security Challenge

MORE IN WORLD »
Piracy off the coast of East Africa has fallen dramatically over the past year thanks in part to better naval surveillance and shipping companies going to sea with armed maritime security contractors. The British government now is trying to persuade Sri Lanka not to upset the new status quo.
Sri Lanka has been a hub for private-security firms in the region because it allows them to carry weapons in and out of the country. But Sri Lanka wants to close these arms warehouses, fearing that weapons might fall into the hands of local militants.
Other countries have taken a stricter view on private firms bringing arms into their ports. With Sri Lanka now also thinking of closing its doors to weapons caches for security firms, shipping experts worry that shipboard security could be jeopardized.
"While the international shipping community objects to these proposed changes, the Sri Lankan government is extremely unlikely to back down on this decision," said Arvind Ramakrishnan, principal Asia analyst at consultancy Maplecroft.
U.K. firms account for more than half of the 24 companies currently participating in the Security Association for the Maritime Industry's certification program, an industry standard that has gained traction in the absence of an international benchmark of quality for private maritime security firms. Most of their ranks are filled by former members of the British military, according to Stuart Niven, operations manager at Britannia Maritime Security.
Sri Lanka's decision raises a difficult legal question for U.K.-based maritime security firms, because arms licenses issued by the U.K. government don't authorize the use of offshore floating armories. Finding reputable alternatives to U.K.-based firms may prove difficult for shipowners, as British companies are so numerous within the industry.
"FCO ministers and senior officials have lobbied the Sri Lankan authorities to delay the implementation of the move to the floating armory to allow Her Majesty's Government to conduct a full assessment and licence U.K. companies appropriately," a spokesman for the U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office said. "We have not yet had a response."
The Sri Lankan Ministry of Defence declined to comment.
Floating armories proliferated even before the Sri Lankan decision. Because some countries bordering the piracy hot spots around Somalia impose severe restrictions on the transit of arms through their ports, these flotillas fill a logistical niche. They allow security operatives to board at the same port where a vessel takes on cargo or refuels and then pick up their arms en route through the Gulf of Aden, between Yemen and Somalia, rather than forcing the ship to make a detour to a port where arms traffic is allowed.
Security guards have become a common sight on vessels off the coast of Somalia, where the pirate scourge costs the world economy between $7 billion and $12 billion a year, according to International Maritime Bureau estimates.
The IMB estimates that incidents of Somali piracy fell to 69 in the first six months of 2012, compared with 163 in the same period last year.
The Security Association for the Maritime Industry estimates that as many as 80% of the roughly 25,000 vessels deemed vulnerable to attack while transiting the Gulf of Aden each year will carry armed guards in the next year.
"The combination of international naval surveillance and private security contractors, many of them British, has put a dent in the piracy threat in recent months," said Philippe de Pontet, director for Africa at consultancy Eurasia Group. He said any obstacles that make it harder for security firms to operate in the Indian Ocean could elevate the risk to shippers.
Losing U.K. contractors could be a liability, warn shipping experts. "It would certainly create a problem for those quality-conscious ship owners," said Dirk Steffen, director of consultancy at security adviser Risk Intelligence. In order to keep their insurance, many shippers need to ensure the security companies have a certain level of quality, he said.
Security firms must now decide whether to shift operations to other land-based arms stores in the area, which could cost both time and money, or run the risk of serious legal consequences.
"We face a fairly stark choice in facing commercial damage and not going via Sri Lanka, or operating transparently, but outside the bounds of our license," said Tom Brind, senior operations manager at security company Solace Global Maritime.

Monday, 10 September 2012

Piracy and Maritime Terrorism, West Vs East Africa

For West Africa-- its mainly HIT AND RUN.

Meaning they are only interested in the cargo, not the hull and the kidnapping of the crew.
Sometimes ransom is taken-- about 8-10M USD per hull-- tanker sized please.

For Somali waters-- hijacks progress to moving crew to land while hull remains in port.
This means we are dealing with a kidnap and hijack at the same time.
Rest assured that if your insurance firm, if you used one at all, will not be happy to max out your policy just for one very VIP customer like you.

Do contact us to let us advise you on your security requirements.
Prevention is better than the cure as they always say.

~~~~


IMB notes increase in piracy off West Africa coast

by ASC Staff on Sep 9, 2012 



The ICC International Maritime Bureau's Piracy Reporting Centre (IMB-PRC) has recorded a spike in activity off the coast of West Africa, logistics firm GAC reported on its website.
Since 18 August 2012, three vessels have been hijacked by pirates in this region. These recent attacks are notable as they have all been against tankers, with the purpose of stealing the valuable cargoes on board.
Furthermore, the incidents reported off West Africa are characterised by the degree of violence used against crew.
On 18 August 2012, a tanker was hijacked whilst at anchorage off Lome.
Another tanker was attacked nearby on 28 August 2012. On 5 September 2012, a tanker was boarded whilst at anchorage off Lagos. In the last case, the crew secured themselves in the vessel's citadel whilst the Nigerian navy despatched a helicopter and warship to successfully rescue the vessel.
IMB Director Pottengal Mukundan said: "The attacks off West Africa follow a different modus operandi from pirate activity in other parts of the world. In addition to armed robbery, the more serious attacks involve the hijacking of product tankers to steal a part of the cargo. All the attacks usually involve high levels of violence against the crew. After the hijacking the product is lightered on to smaller vessel to be taken and sold illegally in the region. There has long been a market for the distribution and supply of these illegal oil cargoes."

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Train as You Fight II

There are many police and second tier SF teams that train only with paper targets, sometimes steel reaction targets in the mix, or robotic range targets (basically the target silhouette moving on an electric rail system), or shooting at target mannequins...

We have always recommended that training should replicate real life.. at minimum mannequins holding SHOOT or NO SHOOT items should be used... regardless of range lighting conditions.

Night, and day plus distraction devices (for example shock wave simulators and strobes etc) are available in more advanced ranges in www.KASOTC.com

Actions of Team Members are even recorded on wall mounted camera in advanced firing ranges.

SF team members need realism-- not the first time realism expected when responding to a real life incident.

Whereas a lot of SF instructors teach "running the walls" upon room entry-- consider this-- in the real world desks, furniture and various obstacles line the walls... learn to improvise... run over, run around or even shoot through obstacles when in doubt.

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Train as YOU will certainly fight!

Quite recently we had a chance to talk to a drug enforcement agency of a major and very clean Asian city.

When we mentioned that they should equip their H and K pistols with silencers and lasers/lights... they said they are experimenting...

They do not make entry with SMGs or carbines, given that illegal arms are a rarity in their country. They do not train to fire with silencers given that this will reduce explosions in firefights in a clandestine drug lab with explosive gases and materials. A raider from the unit told us-- that things need 'approval from the Minister of Justice' and that their enforcement unit does not have the same heavy duties as the US DEA...

We feel this is wrong... a full set of SWAT (Police) training should be offered, retraining programs should be in place, and shooting for all special units should be, SF standards with pistols, shotguns, sniper rifles, carbines et al.

Always enter with full weapons and gear compliment to make the bad guys surrender quickly with no firefights. But unfortunately the drug agent we spoke to said they don't want to have so much gear that the bad guys would run away. Our experience suggest that lasers and super bright weapons lights would be more than adequate to stun the occupants.


Tuesday, 27 March 2012

The high seas have been peaceful lately

Except with the Iranians...
Does anybody have information on the Iranian nuclear bomb program lately?

MV Eglantine owners...  feel free to contact us to help resolve your crisis.

Our kind regards to the owners of the Garden of Eden.

;)