Monday, 7 November 2011

UK Okays use of armed guards against pirates. More teeth against piracy.

 
 

Somali piracy: Armed guards to protect UK ships

 
Armed guard on board a merchant vessel It is up to the flag state of the vessel whether or not armed guards are allowed

Related Stories

Ships sailing under a British flag will be able to carry armed guards to protect them from pirates, the prime minister has announced.
David Cameron says he wants to combat the risks to shipping off the coast of Somalia, where 49 of the world's 53 hijackings last year took place.
Under the plans, the home secretary would be given the power to license armed guards for ships.
No ship carrying armed security has yet been hijacked, the government claims.
Up to 200 vessels flying the red ensign - the British merchant navy flag - regularly sail close to Somalia. Officials estimate that about 100 of those would immediately apply for permission to have armed guards.
Under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea every ship is subject to the jurisdiction of the country whose flag it carries.
It is thought many British-registered ships already carry armed guards because they feel they have no alternative.
However, licensing ships to carry armed guards could still fall foul of laws in other countries. Egypt recently announced that armed guards would not be permitted on ships sailing through the Suez canal.
Shoot to kill?

Analysis

Until now, vessels flying the British flag have not been licensed to carry their own weapons on board, something other countries have permitted.
Pirates operating out of Somalia now range over around three million square miles of sea leaving existing navy patrols stretched.
The hope will be that armed patrols act as a deterrent, but there are risks.
Some experts warn of the danger of an escalation in the violence with pirates responding with heavier weapons.
The practicalities can also be complex - some countries are less willing than others to have foreign nationals working for private security companies carrying weapons in their ports or while sailing in their waters.
And while maritime and security industry experts believe this measure may help, it is unlikely to deal with the fundamental causes of the piracy problem - that will require more effective governance and stability in Somalia.
Mr Cameron said he wanted to legalise armed guards after talks in Australia with Commonwealth leaders from the region over the escalating problem faced in waters off their shores.
But armed guards would only be permitted while passing through dangerous waters, such as the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
Previous government policy had strongly discouraged the use of private armed guards on board UK vessels.
But ministers began to consider amending the position to combat piracy in "exceptional circumstances", Foreign Office Minister Henry Bellingham said in a submission to the Commons' Foreign Affairs Committee earlier this year.
The Home Office looked at how to apply UK firearms legislation on board UK ships, and whether it was feasible to authorise and monitor the possession of "prohibited" firearms at sea, he said.
Mr Cameron was asked if he was comfortable with giving private security operatives the right to "shoot to kill" if necessary, and told BBC One's Andrew Marr Show: "We have to make choices.

Opposing views

Commentators debate the use of armed guards on ships.
Rose George says in the Guardian that there is currently no deterrent to pirates and every seafarer she has met wants to sail with armed security aboard.
But Brigadier Paul Gibson argues in the Times that the Royal Marines should have been given the task of arming ships as shipowners would have been confident of their legality.
"Frankly, the extent of the hijack and ransom of ships round the Horn of Africa is a complete stain on our world.
"The fact that a bunch of pirates in Somalia are managing to hold to ransom the rest of the world and our trading system is a complete insult and the rest of the world needs to come together with much more vigour."
The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), which represents over 80% of the world's merchant fleet, welcomed the move as likely to have a deterrent effect - but said it was only a "short-term measure".
'Dreadful impact' Secretary general Peter Hinchliffe said the ICS was concerned about how pirates would respond to the move.
"To date, no ships with armed guards on board have been captured. But pirates will respond with increased firepower to overwhelm the armed guards, and when that happens the impact on the crew will be pretty dreadful," he told Reuters.
Peter Cook, director of the Security Association for the Maritime Industry (Sami), welcomed the policy change, but Commodore Angus Menzies, from the Honourable Company of Master Mariners, said it would "shift the problem elsewhere".
David Cameron: ''I want to make sure more of these pirates actually face justice''
Mr Cook said many armed guards were former Royal Navy and Royal Marines personnel, and he added: "With the current redundancies it has provided them with an ideal place to go."
Transport Secretary Justine Greening said it was "sensible" for ships to be able to take "appropriate measures to protect their crew and cargo".
Shadow Foreign Office Minister, John Spellar, welcomed the move but said more details were needed from the government about how it would be implemented.
High velocity rifles Sami director Mr Cook said most armed guards would be using high velocity rifles, which were used to "deter pirates" from attempting to board a ship.
A Somali pirate looks out at a hijacked ship Use of armed guards would be restricted to voyages through particular waters in affected areas
He confirmed that no vessel with armed guards had been taken over by pirates, and said in several cases guards had fired shots at pirates.
The general secretary of the International Transport Workers' Federation, David Cockroft, told the BBC: "This is a reassuring move for the seafarers, but the worry is that in the past we've seen the pirates respond to each new defensive measure by choosing heavier weapons and more savagery.
"There is no substitute for all the big shipping flags taking the fight to the pirates themselves, with action against their bases, arrests and jailings."
"So far some of the biggest registers, all flags of convenience, are leaving it all to Nato, EU Navfor, combined forces and a few independent deployments."
Maritime risk consultants Haymarket said the introduction of armed guards would save the British shipping and insurance industries millions of pounds.
John Bisseru, a maritime risk specialist at the firm, said: "Prevention is the way forward, and qualified and trained armed guards will be significant step."
France and Spain provide so-called military vessel protection detachments, while Italy is planning a similar measure.
In July, the Foreign Office Minister Mr Bellingham said limited military resources meant it was not possible to free up Royal Marines for a ship protection role.
Other counter-piracy measures being taken include offering support from Treasury officials to Kenya to help its officials track down pirates' assets.
Mr Cameron also said help could be given to countries such as the Seychelles and Mauritius who were acting to bring pirates to court and imprison them.

Friday, 4 November 2011

Piracy-- shipowners, ship managers and pirates-- you were all warned! ;)

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
is now promoting use of armed guards on vessels...
when private security for maritime usage has always existed...

United States Promotes the Use of Armed Anti-Piracy Contractors on Ships
Sec of State Hillary Clinton Orders Embassies to Sell the Use of Contractors

By Robert Young Pelton, SomaliaReport.com
Hillary Clinton secretary of stateSomalia Report has obtained an unclassified document from the U.S. State Department that orders American embassy staff to promote the use of armed security guards on commercial vessels around the coast of Somalia.
The five page document is a “demarche” request which encourages “the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on merchant vessels to deter or prevent pirating off the Horn of Africa.” What is more surprising is that this October 27, 2011 memo is straight from the desk of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
It is a stunning reversal of opinion for Clinton, a well known opponent of the use of private security companies and a political appointee who has openly discussed taking steps to eliminate them. As a presidential candidate running against President Obama she sponsored legislation entitled H.R.4102 “Stop Outsourcing Security Act”. The suggested legislation was created in November of 2007 proposed banning the use of security contractors.
“The United States is increasingly relying on private security contractors to perform mission critical and emergency essential functions that historically have been performed by United States military or government personnel.”
The bill went on to present the idea that the use of contractors was undermining the US mission in Iraq. It even went so far as to set a six month deadline to remove the private security who protected State Department personnel in Iraq, then provided by a half dozen companies that included Blackwater, Triple Canopy, and others under the WWPS contract and replace them with federal employees.
The legislation failed for the simple reason that there simply weren’t enough troops or government employees to replace them.
Since then Clinton found herself actually working and traveling while being protected by those same security contractors. Although she has never publicly stated her support for the use of contractors (often called ‘mercenaries’ by the media) there were moves to dramatically increasethe number and scope of private security to protect State Department staff in Iraq under her watch.
So with her on the record disdain for armed private security it is surprising to see Secretary of State Clinton suddenly become an advocate for the industry.
Consider this statement made by then New York Senator Hillary Clinton running for president in February 2008:
“From this war’s very beginning, this administration has permitted thousands of heavily-armed military contractors to march through Iraq without any law or court to rein them in or hold them accountable. These private security contractors have been reckless and have compromised our mission in Iraq. The time to show these contractors the door is long past due. We need to stop filling the coffers of contractors in Iraq, and make sure that armed personnel in Iraq are fully accountable to the U.S. government and follow the chain of command.”
Now fast forward to October 2011:
“Drawing on talking points in paragraph 9, Post is requested to demarche host governments and/or members of host country’s shipping industry to encourage the responsible use of Privately Contracted Armed Security Personnel (PCASP) on merchant vessels transiting high-risk waters off the Horn of Africa, in addition to other counter-piracy measures.”
Clinton specifically requests diplomats to promote the use of PCASP on “merchant vessels transiting the high-risk waters off the Horn of Africa, in addition to other counter-piracy measures.” The “Sensitive” document goes on to present the ‘no ship taken while under armed guard’ mantra to overcome the shipping industries lack of enthusiasm for armed men on board. The document then provides a series of talking points to convince nations to support the use of private security guards on board ships and offers to work with these nations to work through the various ITAR restrictions related to weapons on board.
Somalia Report is neither a proponent or opponent on the use of armed guards aboard ships because the industry generally does not want to have lethal force on board, but a quick glance of our list of October pirate attacks and how they were deterred tell a tale that cannot be ignored.
Reprinted With Permission, (c) 2011 SomaliaReport.com



Some blistering truths about maritime security and piracy -- some shipowners don't really care

http://www.unidir.org/pdf/articles/pdf-art2960.pdf

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Full Time Security Team for VIP forming for European position

a full time security team is being formed now for 24/7 security protective detail for a VIP estate.

English and Germany speaking former Special Forces members will have priority.

NGOs operating in Dark Africa and Middle East take note... danger zone.

NGOs operating in Dark Africa and Middle East take note... danger zone. You risk kidnap and various security risks-- IEDs etc

While delivering aid or performing various NGO duties-- note that hostile parties-- such as in Somalia will oppose whatever goodwill services you will seek to offer to further disrupt infrastructure. Security is paramount. Western aid workers are generally worth more than any other type of aidworker.

NGOs-- you need another acronym-- you need a PSD-- Personnel Security Detail
supplied by us. PSD supply more than just security-- they supply expertise to plan how to distribute aid,
plan convoy routes, advise on rebel occupied areas to avoid, and provide on the ground intelligence not available in news reports. Avoid turning an aid providing mission into a hostage rescue mission for your staff and executives. PSDs-- overt ones-- add a layer of show of force to deter armed aggression and make your opponents think twice about disrupting UN sanctioned missions.

See here.

http://www.somaliareport.com/index.php/post/1865/3_Aid_Workers_Kidnapped_in_Galkayo


and the NYTIMES articles here for a tutorial on AL-Shahab which has conducted several kidnaps. They aim to raise their profile though this form of blood advertising.

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/al-shabab/index.html

The Somalis Score yet another goal-- Somali pirates hijack Greek-owned chemical tanker NB the security consultant on board

Stay with a trusted security company
~~


MOGADISHU (Reuters) - Somali pirates have hijacked a Greek-owned chemical tanker with 22 people on board in the Gulf of Aden and are taking the vessel towards the Somali coast, a regional maritime expert and a pirate said on Tuesday.
The Marshall Islands-flagged Liquid Velvet was seized on Monday in the Gulf of Aden en route to India. The 11,599 DWT vessel is owned by the Greek firm Elmira Tankers, according to the firm's website.
"It was taken yesterday. It was going from Suez and heading to India," maritime editor Andrew Mwangura said.
Increasingly well-armed and violent Somali pirate gangs are expected to carry out more attacks as the monsoon season ends and the seas off the Horn of Africa flatten.
A pirate who gave his name as Khalif confirmed the attack.
"We have hijacked the tanker and it is due to anchor near the shores of Garad," Khalif told Reuters by telephone from the pirate haven of Dhanane.
Piracy in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean costs the world economy billions of dollars a year. British Prime Minister David Cameron has said British merchant ships off the coast of Somalia will soon be allowed to carry armed guards.
Pirates operating from the Somali coast have raked in millions of dollars in ransoms from hijacked ships, including oil tankers.